Connect with us

Uncategorized

An Endemic: North Carolina’s Underfunded Schools

Published

on

It is well-known that North Carolina’s education system is one of the worst in the United States. Leandro, an unresolved 1994 case filed by five school districts and affected families exemplifies this problem. Residents who were students in 1994 attending underfunded schools have since grown up and without a resolution in sight, have been forced to send their children to the same poorly funded schools. 

In the case, the plaintiffs had accused North Carolina’s leaders of violating their constitutional obligation to provide quality education for all children. The matter now rests with the Supreme Court of North Carolina. The Supreme Court is currently trying to determine whether the lower court was constitutionally within its rights in ordering the legislature to pay the schools the owed amount. At present, the legislature owes schools $1.7 billion minimum. 

Despite the ruling by North Carolina’s judiciary that the legislators had indeed failed to honor their constitutional obligation to provide quality education, underfunded school districts are yet to see any increases in funding. 

“We have to do better in North Carolina,” Rev. Corine Mack told Courier Newsroom publication, North Carolina-based news outlet, Cardinal & Pine. 

The case emanates from the principle that a child’s place of birth should not impact the quality of education received. The quality of education received significantly impacts the future these children will have, and thus, they must be given access to quality education and modern education. 

The reality, unfortunately, is far from the principled approach North Carolina students need. School funding is determined by the level of the county’s affluence. Students from affluent Orange County receive $5,800 annually in state-supported funding, whereas students in the less affluent Hoke County only receive $654 annually. 

Talking to Cardinal & Pine, Mack expressed her sadness for all the children whose futures have been impacted due to poor funding. “That’s what breaks my heart,” she exclaimed. 

It may be noted that the Leandro case has since expanded from the original five school districts to encompass all 100 counties now. Since then, the debate on inequality has also evolved, taking on a legal and philosophical perspective. According to David Hinojosa of the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, this is a philosophical matter more than a legal one. Hinojosa told Courier Newsroom’s Cardinal & Pine. 

The problem is exacerbated by the fact that underfunded schools largely impact PoCs, such as brown and black students, as these students make up most of the underfunded schools. These schools lack modern technology, the buildings are in a state of disrepair, and the teachers and administrators are inexperienced. These schools also lack after-school programs, quality extracurriculars, or teaching assistants. 

The reason why some schools are underfunded is a cyclical problem. School funding is largely influenced by the local economy, political clout of state and local representation, real estate, and local wealth. So, less affluent counties tend to be underfunded. 

Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans have been able to solve this issue. The Republicans worsened the situation in 2013 when school funding was cut for tax reforms favoring the wealthy. 

Years of inaction prompted Superior Court Judge David Lee to order the legislature to pay $1.7 billion out of the $6.8 billion owed. This was responded with further inaction by the legislature which did not budget this amount, arguing Judge Lee’s order was unconstitutional. This is not a separation of powers issue as the North Carolina legislators are making it out to be. According to former North Carolina Supreme Court, Judge Bob Orr, a constitutional expert, there is little doubt over the ability of courts to remedy a breach of the Constitution. The court is within its powers, as “sound, basic education” is a constitutional right that is currently being violated by the state legislature. 

For some this is a constitutional crisis, for others the real crisis has been faced by the children in North Carolina, who continue to remain deprived of quality education. The fact that Leandro has dragged on for decades has exposed a sad answer to an ugly question: Is the value of children’s lives the same? The inaction from legislators signals a negative response. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

Why Proactive IT Support Beats Break-Fix Every Time

Published

on

By

Most businesses don’t think about their IT until something goes wrong. A server crashes, email stops working, or files become inaccessible — and suddenly, everything grinds to a halt. This is the reality of the break-fix model: you wait for a problem, then pay someone to fix it.

It sounds straightforward. But it’s one of the costliest approaches a business can take.

What Is the Break-Fix Model?

Break-fix is exactly what it sounds like. Your technology breaks, you call a technician, they fix it, and you pay for the service. There’s no ongoing relationship, no monitoring, and no planning ahead. Every incident is handled in isolation.

For very small operations with minimal tech needs, this might seem manageable. But for any business that relies on technology to function — which is virtually every business today — break-fix creates serious vulnerabilities.

The Hidden Cost of Reactive IT

The obvious cost of break-fix is the repair bill. The hidden costs are far more damaging.

When systems go down, employees can’t work. Projects stall. Customer service suffers. Depending on your industry, even a few hours of downtime can mean significant revenue loss, damaged client relationships, or compliance issues.

There’s also the unpredictability factor. With break-fix, you have no way to forecast IT expenses. One month everything is fine; the next, you’re facing an emergency repair that wasn’t in the budget. That kind of financial uncertainty makes strategic planning difficult.

How Proactive IT Support Works Differently

Managed IT services take the opposite approach. Instead of waiting for problems to appear, a managed service provider (MSP) monitors your systems continuously, identifies potential issues before they escalate, and addresses them proactively.

This might include routine maintenance, security patching, performance monitoring, backup verification, and regular system health checks. The goal is to keep everything running smoothly — not to react when it doesn’t.

Think of it like preventive healthcare. You don’t wait until you’re seriously ill to see a doctor. Regular check-ups catch problems early, when they’re easier and less expensive to treat. Managed IT services apply the same logic to your technology infrastructure.

Key Advantages of Managed IT Services

Reduced Downtime
Problems are caught early, often before users even notice. This keeps operations running without interruption.

Predictable Monthly Costs
Managed services typically operate on a flat monthly fee. You know what you’re paying, making budgeting far more straightforward.

Stronger Security Posture
Cyber threats don’t wait for business hours. Proactive monitoring means threats are identified and neutralized quickly, rather than discovered after the damage is done.

Strategic IT Planning
A good MSP doesn’t just keep the lights on — they help you plan for the future. Hardware refresh cycles, software upgrades, and infrastructure scaling are managed with your business goals in mind.

Access to Expertise
With managed IT services, you gain access to a team of specialists across multiple disciplines. That’s a depth of knowledge most businesses can’t afford to hire in-house.

The Bigger Picture

Break-fix might feel like a lower-commitment option, but it often ends up costing more — in direct expenses, lost productivity, and missed opportunities. Proactive IT support shifts you from a defensive position to a strategic one.

When your technology is reliable and your risks are managed, your team can focus on what actually drives growth. That’s the real value of moving beyond break-fix.

If your business is still waiting for things to break before taking action, it may be time to reconsider your approach to IT support.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Everything You Need to Know About Ergonomic Birthing Positions

Published

on

By

Choosing how to position your body during labor and delivery is one of the most empowering decisions you can make as a birthing person. Yet it’s a topic that often gets overlooked in prenatal planning. Ergonomic birthing positions aren’t just about comfort — they can meaningfully support pelvic health, encourage fetal descent, and reduce the strain on your body during one of its most demanding moments.

Here’s what you need to know.

What Makes a Birthing Position “Ergonomic”?

An ergonomic birthing position is one that works with your body’s anatomy rather than against it. It aligns the pelvis optimally, allows gravity to assist the process, and reduces unnecessary tension on the muscles and joints surrounding the birth canal. The goal is to minimize mechanical stress while maximizing space for the baby to move through the pelvis.

Traditional hospital births often default to the supine (flat on your back) position — largely for the convenience of medical staff. However, this position can actually compress key blood vessels, reduce pelvic outlet dimensions, and make pushing less efficient.

Key Ergonomic Positions to Know

Upright Positions
Standing, walking, or swaying during early labor keeps gravity on your side. These positions encourage the baby to engage deeper into the pelvis and can help manage discomfort more naturally.

Hands and Knees (All-Fours)
This position takes pressure off the spine and sacrum, creates more room in the pelvic cavity, and can be especially helpful if your baby is in a posterior position. It’s also gentler on pelvic floor muscles during pushing.

Squatting
Squatting opens the pelvic outlet significantly. Supported squatting — using a birthing bar, partner, or squat stool — allows you to access this benefit without exhausting your legs prematurely.

Side-Lying
This is a restful option that still promotes good pelvic alignment. It reduces perineal tearing risk and works well during the pushing stage, especially when combined with support under the upper leg.

Kneeling
Kneeling upright or leaning forward onto a birth ball combines the benefits of gravity with reduced pressure on the joints. It’s particularly effective for managing back labor.

Why Pelvic Health Matters Here

Your pelvic health is central to every birthing position decision. The pelvis isn’t a fixed, rigid structure — it shifts and adapts throughout labor. Positions that allow the sacrum to move freely (rather than being compressed against a flat surface) support this natural mobility.

Pelvic floor muscles also play a critical role. Certain positions allow these muscles to lengthen and yield more effectively during crowning, potentially reducing trauma and supporting faster postpartum recovery. Working with a pelvic floor physical therapist before birth can help you understand your own pelvic anatomy and practice positions that suit your specific needs.

Talking to Your Care Team

Not every position will be accessible in every birth setting, and medical circumstances sometimes limit options. What matters is that you advocate for movement and position changes throughout labor wherever possible. Discuss your preferences with your midwife or OB during prenatal visits — and put them in your birth plan.

Ask specifically: Can I labor upright? Can I push in a position other than lying flat? These questions open important conversations.

The Bottom Line

Ergonomic birthing positions are a practical tool — not a luxury. Understanding your options ahead of time, prioritizing your pelvic health, and communicating with your care team puts you in a stronger position to make informed choices when labor begins. Your body knows how to do this. The right position helps it do so more efficiently.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Foods That Make It Harder to Keep Braces Clean

Published

on

By

Keeping your braces clean is one of the most important parts of orthodontic treatment. Brackets, wires, and bands create countless spots where food can hide — and certain foods make that problem significantly worse. Knowing what to avoid (or at least approach with caution) can save you from cavities, staining, and prolonged treatment time.

Sticky and Chewy Foods

Sticky foods are practically designed to cling to braces. Caramel, taffy, gummy candies, and even dried fruit wrap themselves around brackets and wires in ways that a toothbrush struggles to reach. The residue left behind feeds bacteria, which can lead to plaque buildup and tooth decay if not thoroughly removed.

Chewy breads and bagels fall into a similar category. They compress and wedge into tight spaces around the hardware, making post-meal cleaning a real challenge. Even after brushing, remnants can linger where the wire meets the bracket.

Hard and Crunchy Foods

Hard foods pose a different kind of problem. Popcorn kernels, hard pretzels, ice, and raw carrots can crack or dislodge brackets — but before they cause mechanical damage, they often shatter into small fragments that scatter throughout the braces. Those tiny pieces nestle into areas that are already difficult to clean, compounding the hygiene challenge.

Nuts are particularly problematic. Their irregular shapes and rough textures mean pieces break off and get trapped easily. Even after thorough brushing and flossing, small particles can remain stuck around the metal.

Sugary Foods and Drinks

Sugar itself doesn’t physically get trapped, but it creates an environment where bacteria thrive. When you consume sugary snacks or drinks — sodas, juices, candy, or sweetened coffee — the bacteria in your mouth produce acids that attack tooth enamel. Braces make it harder to clean those acids away quickly, so the damage potential increases.

Carbonated drinks deserve a special mention. The combination of sugar and acidity in most sodas makes them particularly harmful during orthodontic treatment. Even diet sodas, which lack sugar, are acidic enough to weaken enamel over time.

Corn on the Cob and Whole Fruits

Foods like corn on the cob, whole apples, and pears seem harmless enough — but biting directly into them puts stress on brackets and forces large food chunks into tight spaces all at once. The solution isn’t necessarily to avoid these foods entirely, but to cut them into smaller, manageable pieces before eating.

This adjustment removes the risk of breakage while still allowing you to enjoy a varied, nutritious diet throughout your treatment.

Foods That Cause Staining

Some foods won’t get physically trapped but can still make cleaning feel like a losing battle. Coffee, tea, tomato-based sauces, and berries are notorious for staining both teeth and the elastic bands on braces. While stained elastics are easily replaced at your next appointment, the surface of your teeth can develop uneven discoloration if these foods aren’t followed by thorough cleaning.

What You Can Do

Adjusting your diet doesn’t mean giving up every food you enjoy. The goal is to be mindful and proactive:

  • Cut hard or large foods into small pieces before eating
  • Rinse your mouth with water immediately after eating
  • Brush after every meal — not just morning and night
  • Use orthodontic flossers or a water flosser to reach areas a regular brush can’t

Your orthodontist will give you a specific list of foods to avoid based on your treatment, but understanding why certain foods cause problems helps you make smarter choices on the fly. Clean braces aren’t just about aesthetics — they protect your teeth and help ensure your treatment stays on track.

Continue Reading

Trending